I am really sorry about this, but … as we state in our Guidelines, once your piece has been accepted it goes through an editorial and production process that takes a lot of time. Our policy is therefore not to implement changes in a piece that’s been accepted unless there’s a factual error or grammatical mistake (if that’s the situation, then please flag the error). The schedule of the production editor is already heavy enough as is without my putting an additional burden on him of reposting stories he’s already posted. I hope you understand. HNN has a small staff. We are overwhelmed as is. This is our standard reply. The fact that we need a standard reply suggests how often this happens. I hope that makes our policy more understandable.
Article length may vary depending on subject matter. Most articles run about 1,000 words. Only in rare cases should footnotes be included -- instead, please use embedded links.
- "A high-tech lynching"
- Anita Hill's Testimony Didn't Stop a Supreme Court Confirmation…
- F.B.I. and Expert Reports Cast Doubt That Celebrated Stovepipe Hat Was Lincoln’s
- Presidents from Reagan to Obama ultimately recognized the importance of science and high-level international cooperation in addressing climate change
- California college gets rid of Prospector Pete mascot amid concerns of racism
- Is Howard Zinn’s “People's History” really bereft of nuance?
- Stefan M. Bradley discusses his new book about history of black activist challenges to the Ivy League
- Walter Russell Mead warns that a nasty Brexit threatens the West
- Juan Cole warns Rod Rosenstein’s "Firing Could lead to Trumpian Martial Law and Blood in the Streets”
- Holocaust Historian Slams Germany for Shedding Millions of Death Records